Bipartisan U.S. House Duo Seeks to Upgrade FEMA to Cabinet Membership
A bipartisan pair of Florida U.S. House members introduced a bill Monday to remove the Federal Emergency Management Agency from the Department of Homeland Security and elevate it to an independent Cabinet-level agency.
Democrat Jared Moskowitz and Republican Byron Donalds filed the bill Monday, with Moskowitz saying divorcing FEMA from the bureaucracy at DHS would lead to better outcomes for disaster preparedness and response.
The agency’s mission requires haste, but its workers are too often bogged down in unrelated DHS work, Moskowitz said.
“By removing FEMA from the Department of Homeland Security and restoring its status as an independent, Cabinet-level agency, my bipartisan bill will help cut red tape, improve government efficiency, and save lives,” he said in a Monday statement. “It will also help refocus FEMA on its original mission: as an agency tasked with responding before, during, and after disaster events.”
In a statement issued by Moskowitz’s office, Donalds added DHS had become “overly bureaucratic” and “overly political.”
“When disaster strikes, quick and effective action must be the standard––not the exception,” Donalds said. “It is imperative that FEMA is removed from the bureaucratic labyrinth of DHS and instead is designated to report directly to the President of the United States.”
Law Creating Agency
FEMA, which coordinates federal disaster relief efforts, was moved to DHS at that department’s 2003 inception after President Jimmy Carter signed the law creating FEMA in 1979.
President Bill Clinton made FEMA a Cabinet-level agency, but President George W. Bush did not renew that status.
Moskowitz, a former state emergency management director under Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, has been a consistent advocate for funding FEMA while also calling for reforms to the agency.
FEMA is a frequent object of criticism from lawmakers of both parties and has often been targeted for overhaul.
Moskowitz, who led a similar bill last year, has argued making the agency independent of contentious issues like immigration, which DHS is primarily responsible for, would free it to better focus on its core mission.
“For an agency that needs to be fast, it can’t function in an agency of 22 others,” Moskowitz said at a March 4 hearing. “They shouldn’t be involved in immigration, but why are they? Because Homeland is using FEMA to run every grant of every agency … within Homeland. Half of FEMA’s personnel now are running grants.”
He has pitched the issue as nonpartisan, saying at the hearing that both red and blue states are subject to natural disasters and need aid from the federal government.
The endorsement of Donalds, a loyal backer of President Donald Trump and the Trump-endorsed candidate to succeed DeSantis as governor in the 2026 election, appears designed to win support from across the House’s vast ideological spectrum.
At Odds With DOGE?
Trump, though, may be more inclined to undercut the agency than to promote it.
Since retaking office in January, Trump and influential adviser Elon Musk have aggressively sought to reduce the federal bureaucracy, slashing staff, eliminating directives and – in the case of the Education Department – moving to close an entire department.
The government-wide staff cuts have hit FEMA, which fired 200 workers last month.
Moskowitz became the first Democrat to join the Congressional Department of Government Efficiency Caucus in December, aligning himself with Musk’s mission to make government more efficient. In his announcement, he cited DHS’s hosting of FEMA as an example of an overextended bureaucracy.
For education, Trump said shuttering the federal department would allow states to be more active in policymaking.
Last week, he made a similar move involving FEMA, signing an executive order to enhance the state and local government roles in disaster preparedness.
The order calls for an administration official to recommend “revisions, recissions, and replacements necessary to reformulate the process and metrics for Federal responsibility.”
By Jacob Fischler for States Newsroom
Good luck Co-Presidents Musk and trump don't care about disaster preparedness or response. After all, they're wealthy enough to survive any disaster, and they don't care about the rest of us.